Bayesian Epistemology

نویسندگان

  • Stephan Hartmann
  • Jan Sprenger
چکیده

Bayesian epistemology addresses epistemological problems with the help of the mathematical theory of probability. It turns out that the probability calculus is especially suited to represent degrees of belief (credences) and to deal with questions of belief change, confirmation, evidence, justification, and coherence. Compared to the informal discussions in traditional epistemology, Bayesian epistemology allows for a more precise and fine-grained analysis which takes the gradual aspects of these central epistemological notions into account. Bayesian epistemology therefore complements traditional epistemology; it does not replace it or aim at replacing it. Bayesian epistemology can be traced back to the work of Reverend Thomas Bayes (1701-1761) who found an elementary mathematical theorem that plays a central role in Bayesian epistemology. More on this below. Later Bayesian ideas began to surface not only in philosophy, but also in statistics, formal learning theory, and other parts of science. Obviously, the probability calculus finds many applications because of its enormous flexibility, expressive power, and formal simplicity. Bayesian epistemology shares much with these endeavors, including a certain scientific attitude vis-a-vis the problems in question, but it is worth noting that Bayesian epistemology is, in the first place, a philosophical project, and that it is its ambition to further progress in philosophy. This essay is structured as follows. Section 2 introduces the probability calculus and explains why degrees of belief obey the probability calculus. Section 3 applies the formal machinery to an analysis of the notion of evidence, and highlights potential application. Section 4 discusses Bayesian models of coherence and testimony, and section 5 ends this essay with a comparison of traditional epistemology and Bayesian epistemology.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Problems for Bayesian Epistemology

In the past, few mainstream epistemologists have endorsed Bayesian epistemology, feeling that it fails to capture the complex structure of epistemic cognition. The defenders of Bayesian epistemology have tended to be probability theorists rather than epistemologists, and I have always suspected they were more attracted by its mathematical elegance than its epistemological realism. But recently ...

متن کامل

Pollock on Probability in Epistemology

John Pollock did a lot of interesting and important work on the metaphysics and epistemology of probability over several decades. In Thinking About Acting [15], we find many fascinating and thought provoking ideas and arguments (both old and new) about probability. Owing to limitations of space, I will be confining my remarks to a handful of issues addressed in [15] pertaining to probability, l...

متن کامل

Evidential Probability and Objective Bayesian Epistemology

In this chapter we draw connections between two seemingly opposing approaches to probability and statistics: evidential probability on the one hand and objective Bayesian epistemology on the other.

متن کامل

Objective Bayesian Epistemology for Inductive Logic on Predicate Languages

Main Objective. The main aim of this work is to provide a new justification of the three norms of objective Bayesian epistemology: that degrees of belief should be (i) probabilities, (ii) calibrated to evidence of physical probabilities, and (iii) sufficiently equivocal or non-extreme. While these norms are typically each justified in different ways, it is shown that they can be given a unified...

متن کامل

Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian epistemology

Bayesian epistemology tells us with great precision how we should move from prior to posterior beliefs in light of new evidence or information, but says little about where our prior beliefs come from. It o¤ers few resources to describe some prior beliefs as rational or well-justi…ed, and others as irrational or unreasonable. A di¤erent strand of epistemology takes the central epistemological qu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010